Fraud detection
& AML.

Real-time transaction monitoring, ML-driven anomaly detection, AML alerting, and regulator-ready reporting.

Brief us See work
What we build

We build fraud detection and AML platforms — real-time transaction monitoring, ML-driven anomaly detection, alert triage, case management, and the regulator-defensible reporting that satisfies the inspection process.

Problem · approach · outcome.

How we run this kind of work
01 · Problem

Fraud is asymmetric; AML is operational.

A fraud platform is judged on missed cases and false-positive ratio simultaneously. AML is judged on operational discipline and audit trail. Both have to be excellent; trade-offs between them require explicit choices.

02 · Approach

Layered detection with proper operations.

Rules layer for known patterns. ML layer for novel patterns. Network analysis for ring detection. Case management with proper analyst workflow. Regulatory reporting (SAR, CTR, equivalents) generated from the same audit trail.

03 · Outcome

A risk function the regulator respects.

Detection that misses less; false-positive rate that's tunable; analyst workflow that's defensible; regulatory reporting that doesn't require improvisation.

What we ship.

6 modules · extensible
F-01

Real-time transaction monitoring

Sub-100ms decisioning on transaction streams — rules + ML in one decision.

F-02

ML anomaly detection

Unsupervised and semi-supervised models for novel-pattern detection; supervised for known fraud typologies.

F-03

Network & ring analysis

Graph-based analysis for connected-entity rings, mule networks, and synthetic-identity clusters.

F-04

Case management

Alert triage, case management, investigation workflow, and outcome capture — feeding back into model training.

F-05

AML & sanctions

Sanctions screening (OFAC, EU, UN), PEP screening, ongoing monitoring, and SAR workflows.

F-06

Regulatory reporting

SAR / CTR / equivalent generation, regulator dashboards, and audit-ready exports.

Tech stack.

Production-tested
Stream
KafkaFlinkSpark Structured Streaming
ML
XGBoostPyTorchRiver (online ML)
Graph
Neo4jTigerGraphAWS Neptune
Screening
Refinitiv WorldCheckComplyAdvantageDow Jones

Fraud platform that
regulators respect?

Fintech · risk & compliance
Get a quote

Fraud detection solutions FAQs.

Q-01Real-time or batch?
Real-time for transaction-time decisions; batch for portfolio-wide pattern detection. Most production platforms run both.
Q-02Rules or ML?
Both. Rules for known-pattern recall and regulator-defensible decisions. ML for novel-pattern detection.
Q-03Sanctions and PEP screening?
Refinitiv WorldCheck, ComplyAdvantage, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance. We integrate the vendor; we don't replace it.
Q-04SAR generation?
Yes — SAR/CTR/equivalent generation from the same audit trail used for case management.
Q-05Graph analysis?
Yes — Neo4j or TigerGraph for connected-entity rings, mule networks, and synthetic-identity clusters.

Related across the cluster.